selectmen, fin com, tm, wives of these people in office, the winchendon courrier editor

View previous topic View next topic Go down

selectmen, fin com, tm, wives of these people in office, the winchendon courrier editor

Post  kevinb on Sat Feb 21, 2015 9:02 am

Below I have excerpts of postings that the administrators from Facebook site page "Supporting Winchendon" another site Backyard fence 2. I am vocal with the way the town is operated by these people on account of how they treat the people of this town. they are not nice, they question you on why you want information, they hold back information unless you agree with their ways of thinking. their way for the past 15 years have created a deficit in the town, they split the town against each other.

These are the people who feel they are "elite" and do not listen to your point of view. so many of us agreed we would walk away and allow them to run the town. For the past decade have you noticed what happened? they ruined it with their ideals and failed business ventures.

Now we want it back so we can fix it, they are putting up such a fuss to the point of degradation, insults, temper tantrums, seeking empathy, whatever they can do to claim it was not them and it was you, because you got in the way, etc.

Below are some of the postings from the people in office and their wives opinions of us. You see when I say one of them I am meaning people on these boards and the  controllers aka administrators of the social media sites do not want to hear your point of facts they banishes you then continues to write insults and non truths.

What type of character do you believe they have.  this is why we (the town) want to remove all of them, bring back integrity, character, put a focus on the town growing in a positive way.  below are just some of many post this minority group who hold elected seats and appointed seats by the elected officials (selectmen, town moderator).  they demand answers of how we would turn this town around, I gave many answers and others have given input. they shirk,smirk and call us idiots we do not know what we are talking about. then they go off to their websites and mock us.

We do not want a government like that in Winchendon, we want open minded practical, moderate IQ people. why because they work better in a team and government manner. no one is going around making claim they are the smartest in the room and everyone should follow them.

This was already presented 14 years ago , this is what this minority group is still trying to force feed us with and hold on to control the town. this is why we are in failure. Success they believe is through the weakest link concept, we believe in the rope concept. the rope has many strands that support the weaker strands to create a pliable(Open Minded) strong (community) conduit (many cognitive ideas formulated into an action plan through town meetings with community input direction and decisions).  

So come May with the upcoming election will you vote for the weakest link concept(present Government) or will you vote for the Rope Concept ( new government officials and fresh new ideas for change)?

one of my action plans offered was to offer to sell free space to corporations where they could build to their specs, where buildings will be new and up to date.(Green) another option was to allow interested businesses to have a tax break and raze old brown stones or dilapidated factories and out of code buildings. Allow interested business to build new with ample parking and services for their employee's.  CVS came to town went through Hell to build a building. that was to fit the criteria of a past planning board Member who took orders from this minority group. CVS razed 2 building's and spent more for these extreme demands.

below are just a few comments from this minority group who Claims Sutt is the problem, But Sutt only started a movement that many have wanted for years. we want to change this minority group, they want to stay in control and treat us in the way you see here. you decide which one A or B

A) allow a minority group tell you what you need and ignore you

B) vote for a change, have a voice and receive respect from our leaders.    



back yard fence  site

Ron C


Guest Sat Feb 21, 2015 8:33 am
Posts: 1167
Join date: 2012-04-09


Subject: Re: Sure fire the TM with a new BOS  Yesterday at 2:13 pm Guest Sat Feb 21, 2015 8:33 am

I love how the mantra is now tear down the old buildings and start anew. Was this not on the table when it came to a PD? Was it not shown that a new PD was millions more?
So tear down Mylec and offer a new business what? Here's a lot, now build your business?
I know for a fact that there is no way in HELLo we the voters would vote on building any new structure without an ironclad guarantee of residency.
Look at Hillview,how many pulled out before that was complete and ask yourselves why...the answer is SUTTingly clear Guest Sat Feb 21, 2015 8:33 am

chevy


Guest Sat Feb 21, 2015 8:33 am
Posts: 133
Join date: 2011-04-11


Subject: Re: Sure fire the TM with a new BOS  Yesterday at 2:51 pm Guest Sat Feb 21, 2015 8:33 am
Who said anything about tearing down buildings? Guest Sat Feb 21, 2015 8:33 am

Ron C


Guest Sat Feb 21, 2015 8:33 am
Posts: 1167
Join date: 2012-04-09


Subject: Re: Sure fire the TM with a new BOS  Yesterday at 3:54 pm Guest Sat Feb 21, 2015 8:33 am
You ask I show you with C&P

Quote :
Guy Santos I know some city's and towns just tear down old buildings that are unsafe or cost to much to fix up and start a new.

Quote :
Evie Higgins Tear down anf start new is what you do, not dump $$$$into buildings that are old, and will not meet code without spending much more$$$ ther town dfid not vote on doing this, we wqere presented with a solid project didn't work that way did it???
Guest Sat Feb 21, 2015 8:33 am

Belvedere


Guest Sat Feb 21, 2015 8:33 am
Posts: 438
Join date: 2010-08-19


Subject: Re: Sure fire the TM with a new BOS  Yesterday at 4:29 pm Guest Sat Feb 21, 2015 8:33 am
Don't forget the ever irascible KB.

Kevin Bliss wrote:
Kevin Bliss Keri the problem with this is like the white mountain property. it's contaminated and the cost plus headaches with these type of properties make it not cost effective to potential businesses. the brownstones and other questionable buildings should be razed
Guest Sat Feb 21, 2015 8:33 am

Ron C


Guest Sat Feb 21, 2015 8:33 am
Posts: 1167
Join date: 2012-04-09


Subject: Re: Sure fire the TM with a new BOS  Yesterday at 11:02 pm Guest Sat Feb 21, 2015 8:33 am
Ah-So Sensei Bel

this person is the admin at Supporting winchendon facebook page, he was on the fincom during this who deficit issue. his name is Kevin Miller

Supporting Winchendon shared Philip Paine's photo.
13 hrs · Edited ·
On point!
For reference here's the definition of fraud http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/fraud. Note definition 1b, "an act of deceiving or misrepresenting"
KJM
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the wife of one of the recall selectman candidates, Fedor Berndt  

Erin Berndt I love the smoke & mirrors on their candidates. Who wants to run for these open positions knowing that if they don't have everything Felicia & Danielle want done in a 1/2 hr, it will be their heads on the chopping block next!! Who really wants to repre...See More
1 · 12 hrs

Erin Berndt I HATE SUTT! What do they REALLY represent? Untruthful at best? Damn right!!!
And yet when given the opportunity to ask questions & get honest answers their statement is " oh just wanted to put a face to the name"! Brilliant Felicia! You are a bully period!! You can deny it & twist it in any way you want, it just comes out the same way. You somehow, elected yourself to ruin our town & make ridiculous assumptions & outright lies!! Your site is SMUT! I am just physically ill seeing what you people can pull out of your "pockets" & then post to incite residents. You are a horrible person! Luckily, what goes around comes around!!!

Phillip Paine is a fictitious name being used by one of the minority group.  

Phillip Paine wrote

In the interest of protecting the BOS & TM I would like to state that given these examples from the SUTT FB page, they have been accused, insinuated or have led people to believe that they may be guilty of corruption, criminal activity. By allowing the statements and commenting to them and partnering with these people to create a group, they are indeed accusing them. In sharing Mr. Barnicles post, I believe SUTT is untruthful at best.

kevinb

Posts : 32
Join date : 2010-12-07

View user profile

Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum